User talk:Diliff/Archive1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Blue mountains - three sisters.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading images on Commons.

Please add your images to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them.

EugeneZelenko 14:28, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning The image Image:Dorrigo National Park Cedar Falls.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Thuresson 12:55, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bangkok skytrain sunset.jpg[edit]

Hi, please add a copyright tag to this photo. Thuresson 21:36, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Collins St architecture.jpg[edit]

Please add your files to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them. --EugeneZelenko 14:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006.jpg[edit]

Wow, great work. Kudos. --Quasipalm 03:56, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Notre-Dame_de_Montréal_Basilica_Jan_2006.jpg[edit]

Has been nominated for featured status, along with an edited version. We would like to know which you prefer. - Samsara 12:09, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:US Capitol Dome High Res Jan 2006.jpg[edit]

Spectacular. --Tysto 02:51, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lower Manhattan from Staten Island Ferry Jan 2006.jpg[edit]

Again, great work! -Quasipalm 22:39, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tower_Bridge_London_Dusk_Feb_2006.jpg[edit]

Image:Tower_Bridge_London_Dusk_Feb_2006.jpg - is this your work? LoopZilla 23:15, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photos[edit]

Great photos... how do you get so many? gren 21:08, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Hi Diliff,

My name is Fernanda Viégas and I have been studying Wikipedia for a while now (you can see a paper I published on the subject here). I would like to ask you a few questions about your activities as a Wikipedia "photographer." I am fascinated by the pictorial side of Wikipedia and it would be great to hear about this community from one of its members. Would you be available for an email interview? Thanks, Fernanda.

Thanks for agreeing to participate in the study and sorry for not having signed my name before. I'm getting more Wikipedia savvy as I interact with folks on their talk pages. Here you go: Fviegas | talk

Great Pictures[edit]

The "capitol_dome" and the "montreal_basilica" are the best photos i`ve ever seen in my life! Unbelievable great work!

And the other pictures are also very well!

Encore! The Library of congress is also an increadible photo. Exellent work. I use it as an example of color balence. 71.193.2.115 15:28, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

panorama ?[edit]

Hi :)

Can we know which program do you use to make the panorama ?

Image:Royal_exhibition_building_tulips.jpg[edit]

Hi Diliff, I bleieve your picture is excellent, but I'd wish some more information about where the building stands (Country, city) and who did construct it. Regards --Ikiwaner 15:59, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake[edit]

I am sorry because I edit your talk page by mistake. I apologize for that. Best wishes. --Prevert(talk) 17:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

Hi Diliff,

May I have your full name, so I can give credit when using your photographs, under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License, on websites.

If possible could you please reply on my wikipedia account: Joshlk (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joshlk), Thanks Josh

[reply at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Joshlk]
I am attending to use "London Eye Twilight Motion Blur April 2006.jpg" on my design website; which is not live yet - however I can give you the link ones up. In addition, many of your other photographs are spectacular and may use others.
I have placed one of your pictures on my new website (Kompact Design): www.kompact.co.uk [1] , sory for the long reply

Image:Georgia Aquarium - Sawshark Jan 2006.jpg[edit]

Hi!

I wonder how sure you are that the image really is of a sawshark? There is a comment on english wikipedia stating that it is a sawfish, after searching for a while I found this link which states that there is a Largetooth Sawfish in Georgia Aquarium Gallery: Ocean Voyager where you claim to have taken the picture. Since all pictures of sawshrk and sawfishes I can find are so simmilar I can not see the difference, but I would strongly guess that they would not put two so simmilar species in the same tank in a aquarium, but I do not know. Stefan 202.156.6.54 12:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Versailles Chapel[edit]

Hello Diliff,

I hope you do not mind, but I nominated your image Versailles Chapel - July 2006.jpg as Quality Image candidate. Stunning image. --Thermos 06:30, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Versailles Chapel - July 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Thankyou for such a fine contribution to Commons Gnangarra 11:00, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Leadenhall Market In London - Feb 2006.jpg[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leadenhall Market In London - Feb 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

A wonderful image thank you for sharing Gnangarra 12:07, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

QI[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Central Station Main Concourse Rectilinear projection Jan 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Tower Bridge photo[edit]

Hi Diliff,

I am building a website for a software testing conference that will take place in London (the website is not yet live but will be live very shortly). With your permission, I would like to use a modification (resize image and crop on the side) of your tower bridge picture in the website. Your tower bridge picture is one of the best I've seen. If it is permissible, please let me know how do you want your attribution (creative commons license) be in the website. Please feel free to contact me if you have any question. If you would like to know the url for the website, I'd rather if you contact me through email. Thank you for your generosity.

M4dd13 20:09, 13 September 2006 (UTC) = m4dd13[reply]

Photo of Hollywood Boulevard[edit]

Did you take the photo of Hollywood Boulevard? --Elainelayabout 21:53, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SL Temple[edit]

Thanks for uploading a great picture of the SL temple - I am going to crop it a little for use in the w:en:List of temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I have also created the category Category:Temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints if you upload any others. Thx again - Trödel 16:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CC by attribution[edit]

I intend to use the New York from Staten Island Ferry photo in a "semi-commercial" work and noticed the CC 2.5 license which requires attribution. Is "Diliff" an ok attribution? Maybe a first name could be added? Maybe a link to this page? 82.141.187.170 14:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for letting me know. You can attribute the image to "David Iliff". As a courtesy, would you mind letting me know where you intend to use the image? Diliff 16:51, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Black-headed Gull - St James 27s Park 2C London - Nov 2006 edit2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Black-headed Gull - St James 27s Park 2C London - Nov 2006 edit2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 15:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:30 St Mary Axe - The Gherkin from Leadenhall St - Nov 2006.jpg[edit]

You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by replacing the {{OwnWork}} tag with a suitable copyright tag. --GeorgHH 16:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POTY election implementation[edit]

Some help in needed to organize the POTY election. Please check the conclusions of the discussion in Commons talk:Featured picture candidates. What do you think of doing the election in the period 15-31 January? - Alvesgaspar 14:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Hemispheric - Valencia, Spain - Jan 2007.jpg, which was nominated by Mehran at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Hemispheric - Valencia, Spain - Jan 2007.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Hemispheric Twilight - Valencia, Spain - Jan 2007.jpg, which was nominated by Mehran at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Hemispheric Twilight - Valencia, Spain - Jan 2007.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 09:35, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

About the above... I'm just wondering if you could share the secret of taking those photos? I'm just completely startled by their sharpness and just can't figure out how did you achive it. I could imagine you could have made it with very low light sensitivity... still that seem not to be enough.

Best regards, Nux (talk··dyskusja) 18:36, 25 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

POTY 2006 competition[edit]

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are almost complete, and voting will take place between 1st and 28th Feb. All the featured pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As the creator of one or more images nominated for the election we invite you to participate in the event. Alvesgaspar 22:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Eastern Grey Squirrel in St James's Park, London - Nov 2006_edit.jpg, which was nominated by Andy at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Eastern Grey Squirrel in St James's Park, London - Nov 2006.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 09:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Palace_of_Westminster_detail_sample.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 22:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Toledo Skyline Panorama, Spain - Dec 2006.jpg , which was nominated by Digon3 at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Toledo Skyline Panorama, Spain - Dec 2006.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 20:54, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tram interior edit1.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Tram interior edit1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 19:13, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality image promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koala climbing tree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--Pharaoh Hound 13:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Palace of Westminster, London - Feb 2007.jpg , which was nominated by Digon3 at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Palace of Westminster, London - Feb 2007.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 23:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

QI[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hemispheric - Valencia, Spain - NYE Dec 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Palau de les Arts Reina Sofía, Valencia - Jan 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--AngMoKio 18:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30 St Mary Axe - The Gherkin from Leadenhall St - Nov 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lincoln's Inn Fields - May 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bath Abbey and Entertainer - July 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica Organ Pipes.jpg[edit]

Given what happened to Image:Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica Jan 2006.jpg, I'm thinking this image might have to be deleted too? Sorry. howcheng {chat} 22:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wonder[edit]

Hi, David, I just wonder how come you have not opposed the nomination of that animation Tvashtar erupts from NASA just yet ? Is the quality of that animation is not bad enough for you to oppose? Or maybe you have double standards (one for mine pictures and other for NASA pictures)? Please, understand me right. I'm just asking because you said you would oppose my image of an alien in an alien ship, if in your opinion the quality of the image would not be good enough. Whatever it is I'm glad you have not opposed the NASA animation because in my opinion an Encyclopedia is the place to share the knowledge and not just a high quality images. The questions I asked were just rhetoric questions. No response is needed. Thanks, David and good luck with taking pictures of the day. Mbz1 14:22, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]

Meet our Photographers[edit]

A discussion is going here about the possibility of creating a page named “Meet our Photographers”, where our best creators would be represented. Being one of them, you might be interested in participating. Regards, Alvesgaspar 22:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estadi Olímpic Lluís Companys - Barcelona, Spain - Jan 2007-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter's Square, Vatican City - April 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Commons:Meet our photographers[edit]

As a Wikimedian with at least 10 Featured Pictures to your name, you are cordially invited to add a profile of youself and your work to the newly-created Commons:Meet our photographers page. --MichaelMaggs 14:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Street pic[edit]

I just saw Image:Hollywood boulevard from kodak theatre.jpg - very nice work. It's well-composed and nicely exposed. With a tripod, I'd guess. Thanks for contributing it to the project. Will Beback 07:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Colosseum in Rome-April 2007-1- copie 2B.jpg, which was nominated by norro at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Colosseum in Rome-April 2007-1- copie 2B.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 08:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg, which was nominated by Norro at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 13:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

QI Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

grendel|khan 03:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am writing a mathematics textbook for future teachers and am enamored of your photo of the Washington Monument. May I have permission to use it in a commercial production? (This is a very limited operation with only 400 copies in the print run. My email address is betsy-darken@utc.edu. I am a Professor of Mathematics at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, in Tennessee USA. Thanks.

FP Promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Karen Padaung Girl Portrait.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Karen Padaung Girl Portrait.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Lycaon 21:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Nomination[edit]

Hi Diliff, I've just nominated your great image of London as FPC here. I wish to learn how to do panos so good. --LucaG 22:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:London 360 from St Paul's Cathedral - Sept 2007.jpg, which was nominated by LucaG at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:London 360 from St Paul's Cathedral - Sept 2007.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 21:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can honestly say, that's one of the best photos of London I've ever seen. Wjfox2005 09:50, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Liquid_Crystal_Display_Macro_Example.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Liquid_Crystal_Display_Macro_Example.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

cohesion 00:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

London Pano image[edit]

Thought i would let you know i made an edit to your London 360 Pan image using the polar coordinate filter. Chris_huhtalk 00:30, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:John Daly at AmEx Crop.JPG[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:John Daly at AmEx Crop.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

—Wknight94 (talk) 16:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cebus albifrons edit.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 05:22, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Picture of the Year/2007[edit]

Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that became a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. -- Bryan (talk to me) 14:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! C Class Tram, Melbourne - Jan 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kings Cross Station Platforms, London - Sept 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hay's Galleria - September 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clapham Common Tube Station Platforms - Oct 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yarra Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! QV Building construction site, Melbourne - March 2002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Bath Royal Crescent[edit]

Any reason you haven't nominated your Bath Royal Crescent panorama for Wikipedia FPC? Spikebrennan 18:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Regent Street Christmas Lights - Dec 2006.jpg[edit]

I nominated this lovely image of yours to QI. Fukutaro would like to know if you have a bigger version. Happy editing, Arria Belli | parlami 15:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kookaburra_portrait.jpg[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Kookaburra_portrait.jpg David, Hi. I'd like to directly get your permission to use this lovely kookaburra photograph as a small piece of art in a small-format bird book I'm putting together in the United States. Pweeme Thanks!

  • Hi Pweeme. You're welcome to use it as long as you adhere to the terms of the licence (ie attribution of the photo to myself and referral to the license). Or were you requesting unrestricted access? Diliff 16:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, you'd definitely get a credit as the photographer -- photo by David Iliff. I must admit I'm not sure how the referral to the license is to be handled exactly. From reading the instructions, it seems to indicate the full terms of the license must be reproduced for use in a book, which would be quite long... but perhaps I only need to say that it's a GNU Free Documentation License. Would this be satisfactory to you: Photo courtesy of David Iliff under the GNU Free Documentation License
    • I know, the licensing could certainly be more straightforward. The image is actually dual-licensed with GNU and Creative Commons. Creative Commons is less restrictive in terms of reproduction of the licence in that it only requires a link to the licence page here, rather than reproduction of the entire license (GNU is more appropriate for an entire book than it is for an image). So yes, something along the lines of Photo courtesy of David Iliff (License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/) would be sufficient. Diliff 17:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Melbourne Skyline and Princes Bridge - Dec 2008.jpg[edit]

Hi David, the name of this image seems to be wrong; I think you took it in 2007, not in 2008. I suggest that you upload it under a different filename and let the old version delete (use Template:Bad_name). -- אx 14:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Meet our photographers[edit]

Hi David, don't you want to add yourself to this page? You've been eligible for ages. --MichaelMaggs 09:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Tagus River Panorama - Toledo, Spain - Dec 2006.jpg, which was nominated by Benh at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Tagus River Panorama - Toledo, Spain - Dec 2006.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Mywood 12:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Windsor Castle Sunset - Nov 2006.jpg[edit]

Your image of Windsor castle has been posted to Flickr as her own by this account holder http://www.flickr.com/photos/london_heiress86/509671479/ in contravention of Flickr's own guidelines.

To complain about this licence violation please see http://docs.yahoo.com/info/copyright/copyright.html

Image:Hyde Park Albert Memorial Jan 2006.jpg[edit]

Your photo of Albert Memorial has been posted to Flickr as her own by this account holder http://www.flickr.com/photos/london_heiress86/480198168/ in contravention of Flickr's own guidelines.

To complain about this licence violation please see http://docs.yahoo.com/info/copyright/copyright.html

Nice to see you on COM:MOP[edit]

Glad to see my "inspiration" on MOP, for both the pictures themselves and the "sharing to others" mentality. Did I inspire you this time ? ;) Keep up with the very oustanding work ! Benh 20:30, 18 April 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Palais Garnier nomination[edit]

Hi Diliff,

Thanks for nominating the picture. I'm (nicely) surprised. I never nominated this picture here on Commons' FPC because I believed the quality wasn't up enough to the requirements. The sources pictures were taken without a tripod (they wouldn't let me use it), at f/2.8 and at 1600 iso, hence the poor quality. It looks acceptable because it's been dramatically shrunk down from its original size. I was just looking at the RAWs to let you try a restitch, and hopefully a better "enhancement" but I lost them :(. Benh 09:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Aah, this is a subjective point... I personaly much prefer your picture of the Library of Congress for the colors and the ceiling. I even showcased it when I wrote to the French National Library to ask the authorization to use a tripod inside the oval room (the main and beautiful room of the old library) saying "look what US can showcase in Wiki, and not France ! please let me do the same !". They didn't let me. I'm surprised you couldn't use a tripod on the empire state building as I remember this picture from Daniel Schwen, taken from the Rockfeller Center. If only you'd been there too ! You were almost right, I'm of laotian descent, but I was born and raised in France. You think my english is good because you haven't heard it yet ;) But I like english, it sounds nice to me, and my job involves me spending some times in reading english technical books and articles from the internet. I also have relatives in the US and in... Australia. Maybe this helps in answering your question ? Benh 06:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greater Melbourne Map[edit]

Just thought I'd let you know I had a good laugh at the history of that SVG. Your edit summaries were the best I've seen. Well done at getting it to work (eventually). See you around, and watch out for those vector formats (personally I don't trust anything with infinite scaleability) ;-) -Fcb981 00:52, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ha ha, I wasn't wikistalking you intentionally. ;) I don't spend much time hanging around on commons but I was checking a file and it was a COM:FPC at the time from there I noticed you had written a memoir on this Mallard nomination. Momentarily taken aback at your enthusiastic contributions on COM:FPC I went to your userpage and, to see how active you really were, ended up in your contribs. Needless to say, the consecutive edit summaries of: Optimism at first SVG upload, to: "Lets try again". to: "This is getting silly" got me laughing out loud. By far the best time I've spent on commons. I actually have not used adobe illustrator and given my abilities with a paint brush, that might be a good thing. ; ) -Fcb981 00:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


All your images with regognisable people[edit]

Image deletion warning All your images with regognisable people have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these images, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Canals - July 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Trees look a little bit oversharpened for me, but I like colours and composition --Mbdortmund 21:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please link to the original author in your nom. Thegreenj 20:37, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP Nomination[edit]

I have nominated your picture Image:Amsterdam Canals - July 2006.jpg as featured picture candidate. – Ilse@ 21:14, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP Nomination[edit]

Hi. It looks like you should be used to this, but I've nominated one of your WP featured pics to be featured here as well. Image:Amundsen-Scott marsstation ray h edit.jpg Thanks for all the great shots :) Xymmax 23:16, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Amsterdam Canals - July 2006.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Amsterdam Canals - July 2006.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Congratulations! :-) --Richard Bartz 10:50, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Use of your colosseum pic on TV[edit]

Hi David,

Just to tell you that I saw your picture of Rome colosseum on TV a few days ago. It was on a documentary about crocs shoes. Designers of pin's (to be pined on the crocs shoes) showed that they made them from any picture, and that's when your photo showed up. It was on a monitor which didn't occupy much of the screen, but I'm sure (from the colours) that it was yours. Benh (talk) 15:59, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Location tagging of Image:Torre Agbar - Barcelona, Spain - Jan 2007.jpg[edit]

Hello! I might be a bit picky here, but since this is a featured image I thought it was worth the hassle. The geotagging on this image doesn't really show the camera location, but rather the subject location. As a Barcelonian I'm interested on where exactly you were located and could make a guess, but I thought it would be better if you did it yourself since you know that better than me.. Thanks! Keep up the wonderful work with all of your pictures! Axelv (talk) 22:38, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi! No problem. I didn't actually tag the image myself, otherwise I would have been a bit more careful about the camera location. I've fixed it now. I took the photo from the road near the metro station. The tag should be almost exactly correct. Was it close to what you guessed? Diliff (talk) 22:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, for some reason I thought you were a bit further away, but now when I see it it makes perfect sense. Thanks!Axelv (talk) 23:12, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

Do you support my photo [[Image:Edinburgh from Calton Hill.jpg]]?<nowiki> If so, please comment on [[Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Edinburgh from Calton Hill.jpg]].

FP Promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:London Thames Sunset panorama - Feb 2008.jpg, which was nominated by Massimo Catarinella at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:London Thames Sunset panorama - Feb 2008.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 20:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Brother in Christ. Greetings. i saw your pictures these are very beautiful. I read you about you live in london.we are live in Pakistan.My name is Pastor Stephen Nazir. May God bless you.

Image:Epping Forest Centenary Walk 2 - Sept 2008.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:04, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Champ-de-Mars.
review

Hy I'm a 30 years old artist and I would like to let you know that your panoramas are beautiful! I work with paint and video and I would like to know what I have to do if I start a work using a part of your picture. Usually I add some colors and other images over the image I use as first level (in this case a prt of your panorama) I ask this because (sometimes...!) I sell the works so I don't want to make a mistake using a part of your picture So is possible to use it? What I need to do in order to let know that inside my work there is pieoce of your picture? thanks a lot for helping me and really congratulation for your pictures!

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Diliff/Archive1!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 17:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Link between photographers page[edit]

Hello.

I have made a topic called "More good photographers" on my user page. You could create a similar topic on your user page and you could include me in it. --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stave Hill and Canary Wharf, London - April 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

File:Melbourne Yarra River from Alexandra Avenue - Nov 2008.jpg[edit]

Hi Diliff. There is obviously some dirts on the sky. You may want to fix that. --Leyo 20:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing issues on File:Melbourne Docklands - Yarras Edge - marina panorama.jpg (and maybe other files)[edit]

Hello,

I've noticed that you decided to include the template {{Diliff/Licensing}} in the Permission field of the {{Information}} template. Besides the fact that you're advised to nevertheless add a “See below” mention (people unaware of licensing can not understand), I'd like to draw your attention on something: is that normal that you are talking about the CC by-sa in your template, while your file is using a CC by license?

Have a good day. →Diti the penguin — 14:44, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'm not sure what you think the problem is with adding the template. The template is only there to summarise the terms of the license (I tried to make it more obvious and simple since I have found that many people use my images without reading or understanding the license properly) and also my terms (how to attribute to myself, etc). The license itself is still there further down the page so I haven't really removed anything. My permission template doesn't quite say "see below" but I'm sure that anyone looking for the license will find it. Maybe if you could explain your issue in more detail, I could respond in more detail? Diliff (talk) 15:09, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry if I haven't been clear. The issue is the following: you wrote something about a ShareAlike clause on your template (“If you would like to clarify these terms or negotiate less restrictive commercial licensing outside of the bounds of GFDL/CC-BY-SA […]”), while the code you used is the following: {{self2|GFDL|cc-by-2.5}}, thus your work is still allowed to be included within others works using the GPL for example. If it's not what you want and actually want to use a SA clause, you should fix the license applying to the picture quickly, since its copyright status is a bit unclear. Thank you. →Diti the penguin — 16:41, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney skyline at dusk - Dec 2008.jpg[edit]

I have nominated it for FP status here and it became featured today with 13 support votes and no opposing. Congratulations!--Avala (talk) 11:06, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St James's Park Panorama - Sept 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good --Twdragon 19:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upper Wentworth Falls, NSW, Australia - Nov 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition and high colors --Twdragon 19:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi My Friend[edit]

I´m from Cuba and i love the photography, your work is one of the finest i´ce ever seen, i would like to know your email to contact with you, plase answer me this message and i will be glad of be your friend

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! River Stour in Canterbury, England - May 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Technically perfect. --Massimo Catarinella 10:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knole, Sevenoaks in Kent - March 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe perspektive is somewhat curious on the left side, but IMHO still ok for QI --Berthold Werner 17:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bluewater Shopping Centre, Kent, England Crop - April 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great -- Pro2 19:34, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melbourne_Infobox.png[edit]

A head up on this derivative work, containing one of yours amongst others, that lacks all required attribution and linking to the component works. I have notified the author too. Mfield (talk) 19:55, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

File:Elephant Rock, Great Ocean Rd, Victoria, Australia - Nov 08.jpg
 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Elephant Rock, Great Ocean Rd, Victoria, Australia - Nov 08.jpg, which was nominated by Maedin at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Elephant Rock, Great Ocean Rd, Victoria, Australia - Nov 08.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Leadenhall Market In London - Feb 2006 rotated.jpg, which was nominated by Maedin at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leadenhall Market In London - Feb 2006 rotated.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeds Castle, Kent, England 1 - May 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments More than QI. --Berthold Werner 07:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great work[edit]

One of your images caused me to post a query in the Quality Images talk page and I got browsing your contributions. Great work! Your contributions to the commons are valuable and I appreciate them. --KenWalker (talk) 14:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Wind Turbines and Power Lines, East Sussex, England - April 2009.jpg, which was nominated by Maedin at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wind Turbines and Power Lines, East Sussex, England - April 2009.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upper Wentworth Falls, NSW, Australia 2 - Nov 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good view --George Chernilevsky 20:12, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Russell on Russell Square, London - April 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice image!--Mbz1 19:43, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus and Marienplatz from Peterskirche - August 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --High Contrast 10:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brighton Pier, England - Feb 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good work! QI --George Chernilevsky 09:01, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Admiralty Extension from Horse Guards Parade - Sept 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A high-quality submission which could be a "Featured" candidate. --Iotatau 16:39, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! US Capitol dome Jan 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good! --George Chernilevsky 12:39, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Appealing content, faultless technique. --Iotatau 12:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Dome Church at Les Invalides - July 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A quick promote. Excellent. --Iotatau 07:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alfriston panorama, England - May 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good elevated viewpoint, no stitching errors, decorative canola field. --Iotatau 17:34, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ubuntu Koalas[edit]

Just pointing you towards https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuFreeCultureShowcase, since the next Ubuntu release will be called Karmic Koala, and I thought you might want to submit File:Koala climbing tree.jpg or others for the competition.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kew Gardens Waterlily House - Sept 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 07:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seven Sisters Panorama, East Sussex, England - May 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Landmark captured in the usual Diliff quality. Amazing detail (see people miles away near the edge of the cliff). --Iotatau 12:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! British Museum Reading Room Panorama Feb 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Big and nice panorama with good quality --D-Kuru 01:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estadi Olímpic Lluís Companys - Barcelona, Spain - Jan 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice Panorama, good quality --D-Kuru 11:39, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona Cityscape Panorama - Jan 2007 edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good result! --George Chernilevsky 05:40, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks[edit]

Thanks for your support and let me know if/when you need some assistance. wadester16 00:27, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trafalgar Square LED Fountains - June 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Very good, but tilted. --Afrank99 06:46, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Eeep, you're right. I'll upload a correction tonight. Maedin 07:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have uploaded a corrected edit, 0.1 degree CW rotation. Any more than that was too much. Maedin 16:18, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Very good after correction --George Chernilevsky 17:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'Oceanografic, Valencia, Spain 1 - Jan 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cabot Square, Canary Wharf - June 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good shot! --George Chernilevsky 12:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frauenkirche Munich - View from Peterskirche Tower2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 14:28, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St. Andrew, Alfriston, England Crop - May 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perfect. -- Smial 15:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buckingham Palace, London - April 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice composition, good details --Mbdortmund 13:07, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Admiralty Extension from Horse Guards Parade - Sept 2006.jpg, which was nominated by Maedin at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Admiralty Extension from Horse Guards Parade - Sept 2006.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City of London skyline from London City Hall - Oct 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wow. --Iotatau 21:18, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helvellyn Striding Edge 360 Panorama, Lake District - June 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments David makes it difficult to find technical faults, I failed here :-) --Iotatau 11:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brighton Promenade, England - Feb 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments No stitching errors in spite of "moving objects". --Iotatau 11:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keswick, Cumbria Panorama 1 - June 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments excellent --George Chernilevsky 16:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canary Wharf Wide View 2, London - July 2009.jpg[edit]

Hello Diliff,
I try to speak English, sorry if it's not so good. Can you upload the parts of this picture because in this pictures are stitching erros, see here. Or perhaps you can fix them by yourself. It would be bad if it's not chancing because it's a really nice photo. --kaʁstn 17:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colosseum in Rome, Italy - April 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments YAD, Yet Another Diliff. --Iotatau 22:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
yes, yes, yes! (is not FP?) --Pudelek 21:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skylark 2, Lake District, England - June 2009.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:00, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


File:Skylark 1, Lake District, England - June 2009.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:01, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Buckingham Palace, London - April 2009.jpg, which was nominated by Matasg at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buckingham Palace, London - April 2009.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Diliff/Archive1&oldid=372583021"