Field notes from CitiesIPCC: Day 2
The Cities and Climate Change Science Conference (CitiesIPCC) runs from 5 to 7 March in Edmonton, Canada. To learn more about this event, see Future Earth's conference web page here.
Read our summaries of Day One and Day Three.
If my word of the day yesterday was “inclusion,” the theme of today’s conference for me was “impacts.”
It seems a bit odd to be talking climate change impacts in a city like Edmonton for reasons that I'll let this tweet explain:
Looking forward to #CitiesIPCC in Edmonton! Except for one little detail… pic.twitter.com/KojMZojW1K
— Sarah Colenbrander (@s_colenbrander) March 4, 2018
My morning walks to the conference centre have certainly been better than coffee for waking me up. But even snowy Alberta hasn’t escaped climate change, as the local Edmonton Journal captured in an article on Monday. According to the provincial government, climate change is likely to worsen flash floods, forest fires and other threats in this region. Edmonton, which sits on the North Saskatchewan River, is no stranger to flooding.
Let’s take a moment to appreciate the view of the North Saskatchewan River from the conference center. #CitiesIPCC #YEG pic.twitter.com/oxp8PzMdf2
— Future Earth (@FutureEarth) March 6, 2018
Accra to Boulder
Those impacts were on my mind as I attended a morning session, which raised examples of several cities that are grappling with flooding. It was shepherded by Patricia Romero-Lankao, a senior scientist at the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, USA, and a member of the Urban Knowledge-Action Network. The session addressed on how human factors, such as governments or social networks, play a role in how communities respond to and prepare for such disasters.
Patricia Romero-Lankao speaking at the CitiesIPCC conference. Photo: IISD/ENB | Mike Muzurakis
Raymond Kasei of the University for Development Studies in Tamale, Ghana, for example, brought up the case of a flood that hit Accra on 3 June 2015. About 200 people died during that event from rushing waters and subsequent fires. “If you went to Ghana today, and you mentioned the date 3 June, everybody would be very sad,” Kasei said.
The researcher referenced a hypothetical “70+ year-old granny” whose life could have been saved during that flood if she had gotten a simple message: “There’s an eminent flood. You need to move to a safe location,” Kasei said. “That message was missing.” He is now part of a team working to develop functional warning systems for future floods in Accra.
Romero-Lankao talked about her own experiences in Boulder, Colorado, in the United States, which saw the worst flooding in its history in 2013. Boulder has a lot more resources to bounce back from natural disaster than does Accra, but Romero-Lankao said that event “created effects that cascaded around the social fabric of boulder county.” Those effects included lost homes and shuttered businesses.
Boulder and Accra might not look like they have a lot in common. But what links urban areas around the world, Romero-Lankao said, is that when disaster strikes, it’s poor or otherwise vulnerable communities that suffer the most. “The ingredients for exclusion are there,” she said.
Later that day, I sat in on a session that highlighted one strategy for protecting urban residents from flooding and other climate impacts – green infrastructure. That approach might include expanding parks around rivers prone to flooding or installing green roofs in dense areas to sop up water during heavy rains. Timon McPhearson, director of the Urban Systems Lab at The New School in New York and a member of the Urban Knowledge-Action Network, participated in that event. He wrote for us earlier this week about the promise of "wrapping and embedding nature into our architecture."
Can green infrastructure help cities to combat #ClimateChange? @timonmcphearson, Thomas Elmqvist and more are addressing that question now at #CitiesIPCC: https://t.co/v8QpA6Z1iE @sthlmresilience pic.twitter.com/UaydfRlo83
— Future Earth (@FutureEarth) March 6, 2018
The good life
In the afternoon, I switched from the impacts of climate change to its causes, attending a session on sustainable consumption. It may have been the most animated event of the conference so far.
Afterward, Maurie Cohen, who presided over the session, and I discussed why sustainable consumption is an important topic for a conference on cities and climate change. He is a professor at the New Jersey Institute of Technology in Newark and a leading member of the Systems of Sustainable Consumption and Production Knowledge-Action Network.
At the session, the speakers steered away from talking about buying “stuff,” although they did have some fun with one consumer good.
The antithesis of sustainable consumption – a watermelon chiller. #CitiesIPCC https://t.co/9dCQDwvMlK
— Michael Ian Westphal (@PeaceWestphalia) March 6, 2018
Instead, participants tackled much bigger issues of consumption. “Modern urban civilisation is a product of abundant, cheap fossil fuels,” said William Rees, a professor emeritus at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada. In a forceful talk, he made the case that climate change is only a symptom of a much bigger problem – namely, overconsumption in the Global North. “We are financing our current growth by liquidating our natural assets,” he said.
Halina Brown, a professor at Clark University in Worcester, USA, discussed what people in the north can begin to do about that liquidation. She urged listeners to move away from thinking about “behavioural change.” “When I think about behavioural changes, I think about switching off lights,” said Brown, who is also a member of Systems of Sustainable Consumption and Production Urban Knowledge-Action Network. Sustainable consumption “is much more about what we consider to be a good life.”
Maybe the best example of how attitudes have changed about what constitutes a good life, Brown said, are the homes we live in.
In the United States, people need to live in smaller houses, Halina Brown says in a panel on #SustainableConsumption. "Even two-and-a-half bathroom houses are declining. People are demanding three-bathroom houses." #CitiesIPCC pic.twitter.com/4wfuUsSfXw
— Future Earth (@FutureEarth) March 6, 2018
But some experts in the United States are thinking about how to go in the other direction – to shrink, rather than swell, homes. Brown brought up the case of a push in the city of Portland to create accessory dwelling units (ADUs), which this story refers to as “granny pods.” ADUs are small family houses, 75 square metres in area or even less, that can be built on lots with more hulking homes.
I chatted with Brown about shrinking houses for sustainability. Watch our conversation here:
The capper of the day came when Xuemei Bai, a professor at Australian National University in Canberra, mentioned Future Earth’s Urban Knowledge-Action Network in her plenary talk. It is a global network that brings together researchers, city governments, urban planners and more to address the most pressing challenges facing cities. Bai is a leading member of that network.
"It's still a baby, but it started with such ambition," says @xuemeibai_aus about Future Earth's Urban Knowledge-Action Network. Learn more about how you can take part in this #GlobalNetwork of urban researchers and innovators: https://t.co/LnMNrq1wrQ … #CitiesIPCC @Cities_IPCC pic.twitter.com/MJAZFxbUiw
— Future Earth (@FutureEarth) March 7, 2018
DATE
March 7, 2018AUTHOR
Daniel StrainSHARE WITH YOUR NETWORK
RELATED POSTS
Spotlight on LMICs – Tired of Breathing in Pollutants? Time for Better Fuel Economy and Vehicle Standards
Future Earth Taipei Holds 2024 Annual Symposium
Spotlight on LMICs – The Future’s Juggernaut: Positioning Research as Anchors for Environmental Health