{"id":24605,"date":"2020-02-03T10:00:29","date_gmt":"2020-02-03T17:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/futureearth.org\/?page_id=24605"},"modified":"2021-12-13T08:08:08","modified_gmt":"2021-12-13T15:08:08","slug":"the-report","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/futureearth.org\/initiatives\/other-initiatives\/grp\/the-report\/","title":{"rendered":"Global Risks Perceptions Initiative – The Report"},"content":{"rendered":"
[vc_row][vc_column width=”1\/6″][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”2\/3″][vc_row_inner css=”.vc_custom_1639101287494{background-color: #dddddd !important;}”][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n
Home<\/a><\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n About<\/a><\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n The 2021 Report<\/a><\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n The 2020 Report<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”1\/6″][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_empty_space height=”50px”][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]Global change scientists’ perceptions on Global Risks[\/vc_column_text][vc_btn title=”DOWNLOAD THE REPORT” shape=”square” color=”blueHome” align=”left” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Ffutureearth.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2020%2F02%2FRPR_2020_Report.pdf||target:%20_blank|”][vc_btn title=”Download the Methodology and Demographics” shape=”square” color=”blueHome” align=”left” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Ffutureearth.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2020%2F02%2FRPR_2020_Appendix.pdf|target:_blank”][vc_empty_space height=”50px”][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1580503585694{padding-right: 50px !important;padding-left: 50px !important;}”]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1581355570862{padding-right: 50px !important;padding-left: 50px !important;}”]The Future Earth Risks Perceptions Report 2020 provides the first overview of the global change science community\u2019s perceptions on global risks. The perceptions of more than 200 scientists from 52 countries were captured in a survey on global risks and are presented here. Scientists included respondents across social, natural and physical sciences who had at least a Master\u2019s degree and more than one year of work experience in their field. The report summarizes these scientists\u2019 perceptions on four major themes: the interconnections between global risks, the urgency of top global risks, future committed risks, and emerging risks. This landmark report makes an important contribution by bringing scientists\u2019 voices into the global dialogue on risks. The survey was not designed to be representative of the full global change science community, but rather capture perceptions from a range and diversity of participants. Full details of the methodological approach and demographic distribution of respondents are available here: Appendix on Methodology<\/a>.[\/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1580247063296{padding-top: 20px !important;padding-right: 20px !important;padding-bottom: 20px !important;padding-left: 20px !important;background-color: #e0e0e0 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1580239983538{padding-right: 50px !important;padding-left: 50px !important;}”]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1581355907960{padding-right: 50px !important;padding-left: 50px !important;}”]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_empty_space][vc_separator color=”orange” border_width=”2″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/2″][vc_single_image image=”24975″ onclick=”img_link_large” img_link_target=”_blank”][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/2″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]When asked to identify risks with synergistic effects and likely to lead to a global systemic crisis, over 62% of scientists included at least 4 of the following 5 risks: climate change \u2013 extreme weather \u2013 biodiversity loss \u2013 food crises \u2013 water crises.<\/b>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]Together these five global risks threaten the continued integrity of our biosphere and its capacity to support human life, i.e. food and water. A number of secondary global risks were also strongly associated with these five, namely involuntary migration, social instability,<\/b> and failure of national<\/b>\u00a0governance<\/b> or\u00a0regional \/ global governance<\/b>,\u00a0highlighting the systematic links between climate, ecosystems and society. The question on interconnected risks was assessed by 82 of the 222 scientists who responded to the survey.[\/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space height=”50px”][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]72% of responding scientists identified climate change<\/em> as a central driver to a potential future global systemic crisis.<\/b>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]Of the scientists responding to the question on which global risks are most likely to have synergistic effects and lead to a global systemic crisis, 72% of responses included climate change<\/b>. Given the serious concerns that scientists have raised about our capacity to keep global climate warming below 2\u00baC under current development trajectories, it stresses the urgency and scale of rapid societal transformation needed to avoid a climate crisis. It is crucial that we recognize that the climate crisis is not isolated, but connected to many other systems, in particular, biodiversity loss<\/b>, food crises <\/b>and <\/i>water crises.<\/b>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_empty_space][vc_separator color=”orange” border_width=”2″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/2″][vc_column_text]Scientists rank Environmental & Societal risks as most urgent global risks.<\/cite><\/strong>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]Based on responses from 221 global change scientists, Environmental or Societal risks ranked as the top 8 most urgent risks and were perceived to be likely<\/em> with the potential for major<\/em> to severe<\/em> impacts across multiple countries were either. Of these, extreme weather<\/b>\u00a0stood\u00a0out as the top global risk.<\/p>\n Along with extreme weather, biodiversity loss<\/b>, water crises <\/b>and climate change<\/b>\u00a0were the next most urgent risks in terms of their perceived likelihood and impact. These were followed closely by food crises<\/b>, failure of urban planning <\/b>and involuntary migration<\/b> as well as natural disasters <\/b>and man-made disasters.\u00a0<\/b>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/2″][vc_single_image image=”24997″ onclick=”img_link_large” img_link_target=”_blank” css_animation=”none”][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_empty_space][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator color=”orange” border_width=”2″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_single_image image=”24887″ add_caption=”yes”][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”3\/4″][vc_column_text]Scientists were asked to identify risks which they believe we have already committed to or will commit to in the next 10-years that will put us on a path towards irreversible or catastrophic outcomes. Scientists overwhelmingly pointed towards climate change, biodiversity loss <\/b>and ecosystem collapse.<\/b><\/p>\n These results echo conclusions in the IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5\u00b0C (IPCC 2018<\/a>) and the Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (IPCC 2019<\/a>) which highlight a number of long-term impacts already committed to in the climate system. For example, when a forest is dying, it does not release CO2<\/sub> to the atmosphere immediately, but gradually over the following years and decades through microbial decomposition (i.e. committed emissions). Similarly, when a fragment forests do not immediately lose species in those patches but they go gradually go extinct locally as the forest patch is insufficient in size to support their populations (Tilman et al 1994<\/a>). Recent assessment by the IPBES warns that up to a million species may be threatened with extinction within decades due to a combination of land use change, direct exploitation, climate change, pollution and invasive species (IPBES 2019<\/a>).[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_empty_space][vc_separator color=”orange” border_width=”2″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]When asked to identify additional or emerging risks not already considered in the survey, but of rising importance in the context of global sustainability and stability, seven risks were commonly cited by scientists (listed below). Of note is the large number of emerging global risks focused on societal issues, e.g. erosion of societal trust and cohesion, rising inequality, and rising nationalism; as well as lesser discussed issues such as deterioration of mental health. Together these suggest a need for greater consideration of multiple dimensions of societal well-being in our efforts for a societal transition towards a safe and equitable future.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][vc_single_image image=”24695″ img_size=”70×70″ alignment=”right”][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”2\/3″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n Growing distrust within and between groups (including government, business, public institutions and the public), leading to an increase in social tensions and individualism.<\/small>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][vc_single_image image=”24696″ img_size=”70×70″ alignment=”right”][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”2\/3″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n A major divide in the quality and quantity of resources available to different segments of the population, including, but not limited to natural resources, income, and healthcare.<\/small>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][vc_single_image image=”24694″ img_size=”70×70″ alignment=”right”][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”2\/3″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n In development, planning, and business decisions, failing to take into account the interconnections between problems, solutions, risks, and opportunities could have significant detrimental consequences.<\/small>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][vc_single_image image=”24693″ img_size=”70×70″ alignment=”right”][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”2\/3″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n The emergence of political structures that promote nationalist ideas of identity and isolation from other countries and undermine intergovernmental processes.<\/small>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][vc_single_image image=”24691″ img_size=”70×70″ alignment=”right”][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”2\/3″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n The weakening of services and facilities that help communities meet their social needs.<\/small>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][vc_single_image image=”24690″ img_size=”70×70″ alignment=”right”][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”2\/3″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n The potential for the world population to reach a threshold that exceeds the planet\u2019s carrying capacity, potentially leading to ecological and societal collapse.<\/small>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][vc_single_image image=”24692″ img_size=”70×70″ alignment=”right”][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”2\/3″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n A significant and widespread decline in mental health affecting emotional, psychological, and social well-being with impacts on economic, political, and social spheres.<\/small>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/6″][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_empty_space height=”50px”][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" [vc_row][vc_column width=”1\/6″][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”2\/3″][vc_row_inner css=”.vc_custom_1639101287494{background-color: #dddddd !important;}”][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text] Home [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text] About [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text] The 2021 Report [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1\/4″][vc_column_text] The 2020 […]<\/p>\nFUTURE EARTH \u200bRISKS PERCEPTIONS REPORT 2020<\/h1>\n
1st Edition<\/h2>\n
About the Report<\/h2>\n
Key Messages<\/h1>\n
\n
Interconnected Risks<\/small><\/em><\/span><\/h5>\n
Global Systemic Crisis<\/h2>\n
A Climate Emergency and Planetary Crisis<\/h2>\n
Top Risks<\/small><\/em><\/span><\/h5>\n
Committed Risks<\/small><\/span><\/em><\/h5>\n
Emerging Risks<\/small><\/em><\/span><\/h5>\n
Erosion of societal trust, cohesion, and values<\/h5>\n
Rising inequality<\/h5>\n
Failing to take into account feedbacks across systems<\/h5>\n
Rise of nationalism<\/h5>\n
Deterioration of social infrastructure<\/h5>\n
Overpopulation<\/h5>\n
Deterioration of mental health<\/h5>\n