User talk:J. Patrick Fischer

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

If anyone want to delete again images,just because they were published at Facebook, read this!

Liceu Dr. Francisco Machado[edit]

Por favor, reconsidere e desfaça a sua edição, pois o "Liceu Dr. Francisco Machado" é um edifício e câmpus universitário da Faculdade de Ciências da Educação da Universidade Nacional Timor Lorosa'e. Se há dúvidas, ver neste link: [1]. HallelTalk 20:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

correto. --JPF (talk) 20:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Many thanks for the photo: Statue_auf_dem_Bayerischen_Landtag_3427.jpg. I used it & gave you credit for it in one post (http://g-c-lichtenberg.blogspot.ca/2012/03/prologo-y-pararrayos-preface-lightning.html) of my blog on G. C. Lichtenberg (http://g-c-lichtenberg.blogspot.ca/). Thanks again!

Claudia Athenacgy (talk) 14:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fine! Thank you! --JPF (talk) 14:49, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Distriktkarten Osttimor[edit]

Moin! Was hat sich 2015 oder 2016 geändert? Es müssten dann ja einige Karten aktualisiert werden. Viele Grüße, NNW 17:45, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, ich hatte es schon mal in der Kartenwerkstatt geschrieben und Chumwa wollte versuchen, neue Vorlagen zu erstellen. Auf allen administrativen Ebenen wurden Grenzen verschoben. Teilweise haben die Sucos komplett andere Territorien. Man erkennt am besten, dass eine Timorkarte aktuell ist, wenn bei der Gemeinde Lautém ein Bommel an der Westgrenze hängt. Hier zum Beispiel gäbe es die neuen Grenzen der Gemeinden (ehemals Distrikte). Die Grenzen der Sucos finden sich auf Karten der einzelnen Verwaltungsämter (ehemals Subdistrikte) auf der Seite des Ministeriums für Staatsadministration unter den Menüpunkten Serviços->Administracao Municipal->Municipio de... ->Name des Verwaltungsamtes. Chumwa meinte, es sei zwar knifflig, aber man könne die Karten dort so zurechtschieben, dass sie in die Projektionen der derzeitigen Blanko-Karten passen, was das Aktualisieren erleichtern würde. Schönen Gruß, --JPF (talk) 18:45, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Die Änderungen erfolgten 2015. --JPF (talk) 18:46, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Auf der Website, die du verlinkt hast, fehlt Oecusse. Hast du eine Ahnung, wo die abgeblieben ist? Wenn ich eh schon durch alle Suco-Karten durch muss, möchte ich die letzten dort natürlich auch noch prüfen. NNW 14:34, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stimmt, die Sonderverwaltungsregion taucht beim Ministerium nicht auf. Letzte Woche bin ich endlich auf eine einfache Karte Oecusses beim Statistischen Amt gestoßen. Grob geprüft scheinen die Grenzen der Verwaltungsämter dort erhalten blieben zu sein, die der Sucos leider nicht. --JPF (talk) 05:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Timor Lest election result[edit]

Parties in parliament 2018

Hello. Can I ask what is the source of your circular diagram showing the number of seats won by parties in the Timor Lest election of this year? As far as I know the vote occured by coalition, so I fail to see how the parties could have decided to share these seats this way. Cordially--Aréat (talk) 22:08, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Aréat: ! You can find here an overview, who was elected into parliament (beside further informations). The parties and coalitions have set up lists of candidates, the order there is deciding, who will enter into parliament. If someone is leaving parliament, the next on the list enters into parliament. Two parliamentarians of AMP has left their seat for their followers and members of theit parties entered into parliament. FDD has collapsed on 17 June. AMP is still existing, but all three member parties are decided to set up their own bench. An overview is available here: de:Liste der Abgeordneten im Nationalparlament Osttimors 2018–2023, but I have to update it again, because the new members of government (swear in was Friday) have to give up their seat in parliament, because of constitution. --JPF (talk) 12:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Aréat: : FM and UDT are forming a bench since 21 June. Parlamento timorense vai ter sete bancadas, com coligações a dividirem-se em partidos, 21. Juni 2018 --JPF (talk) 06:15, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for clearing it up! --Aréat (talk) 13:18, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ost-Timor Fotos[edit]

Hallo Patrick. Wie Sie wissen, habe ich angefangen, meine Fotos von Ost-Timor hochzuladen. Obwohl ich nur 5 Tage dort war, konnte ich einige davon machen. Die meisten sind eher Dinge als Menschen, dh Fahrzeuge, Landschaften, Gebäude usw. Ich werde auch einige neue en.wiki Artikel für den asiatischen Monat (und später) erstellen. Im Moment ist die en.wiki-Berichterstattung von Ost-Timor wirklich nicht gut genug und braucht viel Arbeit. Ich werde wahrscheinlich auch viele der neuen en.wiki Artikel auf Übersetzungen Ihrer de.wiki Artikel basieren. Bahnfrend (talk) 04:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Freut mich! Sagen Sie (Nicht duzen?) Bescheid, wenn Sie Hilfe benötigen. Ich unterstütze auch gerne bei der Kategorisierung der Bilder. Auf eine gute Zusammenarbeit! --JPF (talk) 05:30, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Übrigens habe ich hier Bilder gesammelt, die bisher nicht genutzt werden, aber brauchbar sind. Falls Du variieren willst. --JPF (talk) 05:53, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Motaain[edit]

Thank you for the compliment but I don't think I deserve it. If you understand Indonesian, you will see that the author's description mentions "Motaain, NTT", and to my modest knowledge, NTT or Nusa Tenggara Timur is in Indonesia, not in Timor Leste. However since you seem to have a superior knowledge, I will humbly let you decide on the correct location, Humboldt (talk) 21:10, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moin! Bei der Datei gibt es einen Fehler in der Lizenzierung. Statt „Cc-by-sa-4.0-migrated“ muss es entweder „Cc-by-sa-4.0“ oder „Cc-by-sa-3.0“ heißen. Migrieren kann hier nichts, da die Datei nicht vor dem 1. August 2009 hochgeladen wurde. Viele Grüße, NNW

@NordNordWest: So besser? Keine Ahnung, wenn ich mich richtig erinnere, habe ich die Lizenz einfach kopiert. Keine Ahnung, wie diese Vorlage kreiiert wurde.
Sowas passiert. Jetzt ist alles gut. NNW 08:02, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, you stated that this photo wasn't taken in either Zimbabwe or Germany. Can you tell what place that the photo was taken because I am currently organizing the photos of flags by place. RainbowSilver2ndBackup (talk) 15:53, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I want you to ask you to respect, that I do not want to say, where I have been, when I took this photo. See en:Wikipedia:Anonymity. It is not relevant for the photo and it is of no interest for reader. Anyhow, I can not see any benefit for readers, when you are guessing image locations. Thank you. --17:45, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Using your orginal maps to edit Open Street Map[edit]

I have been adding substantially to the OSM in Timor Leste (Aileu and Oecusse municipalities so far) in the last few months (my user name there is the same:matthewsheffield) but have just noticed that your maps would be useful for adding village and town names that don't seem to have added on previous imports of data. I was hoping you would wave rights for OSM to allow this use. Thanks, Matthew — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewsheffield (talk • contribs) 05:51, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Matthewsheffield! You can use all my informatons, but you do not need to use the maps. All known settlements of Timor-Leste can be found in the lists of settlements in Timorese municipalities. Check this: de:Kategorie:Liste (Orte in Osttimor nach Gemeinde). Greetings, --JPF (talk) 11:58, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That's a great resource. I would never have thought to look at Wikipedia in another language, and if I had it would only have been Portuguese. But thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewsheffield (talk • contribs) 12:50, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

German Wikipedia has over 2500 articles about Timor-Leste. ;-) --JPF (talk) 21:16, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Timor-Leste 2020[edit]

Hallo Patrick.

Ich habe Ihren Zuschussantrag für Ihr Osttimor-Projekt gesehen. Ich werde wahrscheinlich an der Bangkok Wikimania teilnehmen und bin daran interessiert, auch am Osttimor-Projekt teilzunehmen. Ich lebe in Australien und konnte auf dem Rückweg von Bangkok über Dili einfach umfahren. Wie Sie wissen, besuchte ich Osttimor im Jahr 2018 und habe seitdem Fotos hochgeladen und Artikel für en.wiki erstellt. (In diesem Jahr habe ich nur vier Artikel für Wikipedia Asian Month 2019 erstellt, aber das lag daran, dass ich stattdessen viele Fotos (hauptsächlich aus dem Heiligen Land) hochgeladen habe. Weitere Artikel folgen in Kürze.)

Gibt es eine Chance, dass ich in das Osttimor-Projekt involviert werde? Ich kann nicht 21 Tage dafür aufwenden, aber ich könnte auf jeden Fall ein paar Tage oder so dort verbringen (und hoffentlich noch ein paar Fotos machen, darunter ein besseres Foto von Ágio Pereira). Ich kann Ihnen auch eine Facebook-Freundschaftsanfrage senden (Sie kennen mich bereits als Fotograf des Heineken-Fotos).

Bahnfrend (talk) 07:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Bahnfrend! Danke für Dein Angebot! Über weitere Hilfe beim Projekt würde ich mich freuen, gerade bei den Workshops zum editieren wäre das sicher hilfreich. Den Kostenantrag will ich jetzt aber erstmal nicht erweitern und gucken, wie die Reaktion von WMF ist. Du könntest Dich aber schon beim Antrag unter Endorsement für das Projekt einsetzen und auf FB können wir uns auch gerne verbinden. Schönen Gruß, --JPF (talk) 10:27, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lawine mit einzelnen Löschanträgen[edit]

Hallo J. Patrick Fischer, Du hast gerade User talk:Multichill geflutet mit mehr als 30 einzelnen Löschanträgen – offenbar allesamt mit kurzen out of scope-Begründungen. In dieser Form ist dies nicht erwünscht und disruptiv. Löschanträge in diesem Volumen, die thematisch eng zusammengehören, sind zu bündeln. Einzelheiten hierzu finden sich unter COM:MASSDEL. Als Werkzeug empfiehlt sich Help:VisualFileChange.js. Das Problem ist hier, dass es nicht zumutbar ist, über 30 Mal die gleiche Diskussion zu führen, inwiefern Bilder der amerikanischen Streitkräfte über Hilfsaktionen vor Ort im Projektrahmen liegen oder nicht. Es wäre besser, diese Diskussion nur ein einziges Mal zu führen bzw. einfach auch mal zu sehen, ob es frühere Diskussionen dazu gibt. Für generelle Diskussionen empfiehlt sich COM:VP. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 12:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Info. Das Werkzeug kannte ich noch nicht. --JPF (talk) 13:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
These nominations are without merit and disruptive. Please spend your time om something more useful and stop harassing me and other batch uploaders. Multichill (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I am doing. I am uploading a lot of images, too, but I am looking, if they are useful. --JPF (talk) 13:59, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inkompetente Löschanträge zur Abarbeitung[edit]

Gerettet[edit]

Hi[edit]

Hi JPF. I don't know if you get my complaint about your DR notice on my talk page or not (see here). There're more than 20 DR notices that I got from you today. I was really annoyed with them so please stop sending those notices to me. Thank you. ⁂๖ۣۜJon ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 14:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nguyenhai314! Sorry, I am not doing DR generally, but here has been so many not useful images, so I added the DR for them. I will not make single DRs this way again. Promised. But please take care when uploading images, they are not holiday shots, which are not useful for anything. This just filling the category galleries. Greetings, JPF (talk) 14:40, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

--Yann (talk) 08:56, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "I have just been banned on Commons for "frivolous deletion requests and harassment", which I think is unjustified. After all, I don't think the images are useful and I haven't insulted other users. My poorly executed DR has already been pointed out to me and I have also understood this and said that I will use the other tool when I do LAs again. I have very rarely posted DR in the last 16 years and the procedure in Commons is different from Wikipedia.

Also, administrator Yann interfered with my user page and deleted an image that was my protest against the several hundred unwarranted DR against images of mine in early 2021. At that time there were several hundred individual DR and the complainant was not prosecuted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:J._Patrick_Fischer&diff=next&oldid=617873412

The image is regular on Commons, also not uploaded by me and not a personal attack on individual users, but protest against the situation. The interference is inadmissible. JPF (talk) 09:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
"[reply]
Unblock reason: "I understand your frustration and I forgive you. Unblock is granted on two conditions:
  1. You do not put file:Ein freches Mädchen zeigt Stinkefinger.jpg neither on your userpage nor on your talkpage.
  2. You do not nominate photos created by US Army for deletion. Generally they will be kept anyway.
Failure to follow these two conditions means another block. Taivo (talk) 15:54, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
"[reply]
This template should be archived normally.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  suomi  हिन्दी  македонски  русский  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

Hello Taivo! Thank you for unblocking. To explain the situation: The image is "not expresing hatred of or vilify others", it is seen as protest against the situation, which represented to me last year in Commons, when I got no administrative support, when I was flooded with hundreds of DR. From a democratic point of view, I see it as questionable to make a restriction here, which is why I would like to ask you to reconsider this.
The DRs were the first of several that I have made in 16 years of work. I have already been pointed out my mistakes in the procedure by AFBorchert and I have also signalled that I will not repeat this mistake. This does not change my opinion of the images concerned. I find it very strange that my opinion (Out of Scope) was removed from the deletion discussions and that the DR was simply closed after only two days. Banning future DR on all US Army images is also surprising. For me, the DR are not directed against the source of the images (there are far more in the categories I observe), but against the sense I do not see in the images, which have also been unused for many years. This is a view that can be discussed objectively, but that did not take place in the deletion discussion. I do not intend to ask DR about these pictures again. But I am very surprised that discussions about all US Army images are generally forbidden. Again, I don't see this in the spirit of the project or democratic principles. I would therefore like to politely ask you to reconsider these guidelines and write me a response here. Yours sincerely, --JPF (talk) 16:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The first point is an old question, what is more important: free speech or freedom not to be insulted. Generally is accepted, that free speech does not mean freedom to insult others. Commons users must be nice towards other people, that's why I request to remove the image from your userpage. The fact that you do not want to insult somebody specifically is not so important.
The second point (not to nominate photos created by US Army for deletion) is really strange, but in my opinion necessary. I have nominated US Army photos for deletion in the past and I was surprised to see, that even quite bad quality photos got keep votes – and you see the same as well. I looked some of your nominations and now the files are used in Wikidata and other projects, look yourself. They are all in scope. Now I will close some your DR-s. Taivo (talk) 17:33, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thank you for your answer. --JPF (talk) 17:47, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Du bist ...[edit]

in Mittelhessen und sagst niemandem Bescheid? Möööööönsch - da hätten wir doch gerne in Marburg ein Treffen hinbekommen mit den Leuten, oder, User:Stefan Flöper? Viele Grüße, Emha (talk) 10:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tut mir leid, das war alles sehr spontan und ich wusste noch nicht mal genau, was mich erwartet. Dass so ein Hammer rauskommt, war mehr als ich zu träumen wagte. Falls Marburg und UNPAZ wieder einen Austausch machte, könnte man sich überlegen, mit mehr de-Wikipedianern aufzutauchen. ;) Darf man Euch auf die potentielle Liste nehmen? Schönen Gruß, JPF (talk) 20:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi JPF, klar - und nicht nur uns beiden, sondern den ganzen Mittelhessen-Stammtisch. Wir haben uns auch mal getroffen, als vor Äonen das Schiedsgericht in Limburg tagte. Tolle Story (inzwischen im Kurier nachgelesen) und schöner Erfolg! Viele Grüße, Emha (talk) 22:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also..., in Limburg war ich noch nie... ;-) JPF (talk) 20:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Baucau[edit]

Hallo! Thanks for reverting my change on Category:Baucau (city). I came to take a look at this category and others related when categorizing files in Category:Files from wilford peloquin Flickr stream (East Timor, 1971). I was quite confused by 3 things named Baucau (municipality, administrative post and city). I hope I left the categories less confusing now with the creation of Category:Baucau, Category:Administrative posts of Baucau (Municipality) and Category:Sucos of Baucau Administrative Post. Please make any changes that may be needed. One question for you for which I couldn't find an answer. Is Category:Baucau (city) in a suco, and if yes which one? Or is the city its own suco? Thanks. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 21:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cryptic! City of Baucau is ranging over several sucos in Baucau administrative post, which makes it necessary to double categorize some images. On the other hand, the sucos with parts of Baucau city are not completely urban. They are having rural areas, with several other settlements. Timorese geography is complicated. Settlements in East Timor are sometimes in one suco, sometimes ranging over several sucos and sometimes even over several posto administrativos.
BTW: Baucau airport is outside the city. ;-) Generally, you can have a look on German Wikipedia to check, although I am still updating them after administration changes in 2015. So far, Ainaro, Atauro, Aileu and Dili are completely updated. In the moment I am working on Liquica, beside updating census data of 2022 and changes after election in May 2023.
Are you going on working on Baucau categories? There are still some sucos of Baucau not in the correct category.
Greetings, JPF (talk) 04:50, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my, this is complex :) I wasn't planning on doing too much work on Baucau. I have a few thousand pictures from wilford peloquin to categorize and correct metadata. I run a bot and was able to script moving sucos to Baucau municipality. If you're interested I could do this for all municipalities in East Timor. Let me know. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 12:40, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Without doing this for all sucos, it is just half of work done. ;-) JPF (talk) 16:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I created and filled Category:Administrative posts of East Timor by municipality and Category:Sucos of East Timor by municipality. I'd like to also create Category:Sucos of East Timor by administrative post but it will have to wait until tomorrow. Let me know if you think it'd be helpful. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 19:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category[edit]

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Portuguese colonial architecture in Dili (municipality). ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 03:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very complicated. Sorry. JPF (talk) 15:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]